Replying to a tweet by 🇺🇦 indutny ( fosstodon.org/@indutny )

Mar 21, 2018, 11:12 PM UTC

Replying to a tweet by 🇺🇦 indutny ( fosstodon.org/@indutny ):

`typedoc` is awesome, but I can’t make it do this.

@indutny TypeDoc doesn’t currently support just documenting a public api. There is an open issue if someone wanted to implement this github.com/TypeStrong/typ…

Also posted to: twitter.com

Anthony Ciccarello

About the author

I'm a software engineer living in Southern California building cool things using JavaScript and other web technologies. I enjoy traveling to other countries and spending time in nature.

Connect Subscribe

Responses

See how to respond...

Respond from another site

Responses are collected from posts on other sites. Have you posted somewhere that links to this page? If so, share the link!

Respond via email

If you'd prefer to message me directly, send an email. If you'd also like your message to be visible on the site I can add it as a comment.

Reply via Email

View more links

Mar 9, 2018, 6:09 PM UTC

@jankrems @_jayphelps So my understanding is that Array defers to any existing methods, but the non-enumerable spec method doesn’t get copied to MooTools’s Elements prototype.

TC39
smooshgate

Mar 21, 2018, 11:22 PM UTC

@indutny I think that’s possible. Some people accidentally do that but it may not be clean. I’d love to see improvements or at least a documentation guide around this. github.com/TypeStrong/typ…

Anthony Ciccarello

Responses

Respond from another site

Respond via email

View more links

Previous

Next